Legal Opinion

Holt v. City of East St. Louis

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Benjamin Boneau, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is an appeal from a judgment of confirmation of a special tax to pay the cost of grading and paving Bangh avenue, in East St. Louis. The ordinance provides that the cost shall be paid by special taxation of contiguous property, in proportion to its frontage. Appellants’ only objection to the tax assessed under the ordinance is, that the city is not required to pay the cost of street intersections, and they contend that streets crossing the one on which the improvement is made are abutting property, within the meaning of the statute. We do not agree with this contention. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scammon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Walters v. Town of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. PolandMontana Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API