Legal Opinion

PLEASANCE v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 2009No. 1-08-1510PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lampkin

Plaintiff, Pamela Pleasance, as special administrator of the estate of her son, Michael Pleasance, was issued a $12.5 million jury award in her wrongful death action. Defendants, the City of Chicago (the City) and Alvin Weems, appeal the trial court’s order denying their posttrial motion challenging that verdict. Defendants contend a new trial is warranted because the underlying trial was fundamentally unfair where plaintiffs counsel repeatedly made improper comments not based on evidence, and the trial court improperly issued jury instructions. Defendants also contend the trial court erred…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bullard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Turner v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Lecroy v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Awalt v. MarkettiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. DiCosolo v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Davis v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Cobige v. City of Chicago, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Cobige v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API