Woodward v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Sheriff's Arguments
¶ 14 The Sheriff makes several arguments In support of the superior court's denial of Woodward's petition, many of which were considered and rejected in Barr. We address each in turn.
A. Nelson Remains Good Law
¶ 15 The Sheriff argues that because Nelson was decided before relevant statutory amendments to RCW 13.50.260, it no longer applies. We disagree.
¶ 16 The Sheriff first asserts that it is not clear whether Nelson applies to class A juvenile felony convictions, noting that Nelson does not identify the petitioner's crimes or address whether they fit into the exclusion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cai Hunter Mcintosh, V. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024