State v. Pope
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
Roderick Pope appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Pope argues the trial court erred in: (1) refusing to suppress the evidence seized during the search of the vehicle when law enforcement did not have reasonable suspicion to justify the traffic stop; (2) refusing to suppress the evidence seized during the search of the vehicle because law enforcement did not have probable cause to believe the vehicle contained evidence of criminal activity and no exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless search; and (3) finding a sufficient chain of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- United States v. Conrad Whitehead, Ii, United States of America v. Hector QuesadaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PradubsriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017