United States v. Mazza
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Cheyne Mazza challenges his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in applying the United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”) by [1] refusing to grant a reduction for acceptance of responsibility and [2] counting a prior Connecticut conviction in determining criminal history category notwithstanding that Connecticut afterward decriminalized the conduct giving rise to that conviction. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
This Court reviews the procedural…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- McNeill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Julio OliverasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. James A. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. AbdulazizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. James Clark, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Herrera v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- US HF Cellular Commc'ns v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Tony WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021