United States v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted David Brown of being a felon in possession of a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Brown moved for a post-verdict judgment of acquittal, arguing that the sole evidence presented against him at trial—his confession—could not support the jury’s verdict. Invoking the “corroboration rule,” the district court agreed with Brown and acquitted him. The United States appeals. Because sufficient independent evidence establishes the trustworthiness of Brown’s statements, we reverse.
I
In April 2006, Jason Helms reported that someone had stolen a Glock .40 caliber…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Carl J. WagnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Tennessee v. Fred Chad Clark, IITennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. LaRosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- United States v. Shanna RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.