Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1974PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Defendant was sentenced to the minimum permissible sentence as a second felony offender (Penal Law, § 70.06) and thus the sentence imposed cannot be considered unduly harsh or excessive so as to constitute an abuse of discretion (see, e.g., People v. Dittmar, 41 A D 2d 788). We find no merit in defendant’s contention that section 70.06 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional in that its minimum sentence requirement constitutes a harsh and excessive sentence and thus cruel *256and unusual punishment because it imposes an increased sentence for second and habitual offenders and removes from the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. John Allen Kendrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People v. RicciardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. CandelariaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. NavedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API