People v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
Defendant was sentenced to the minimum permissible sentence as a second felony offender (Penal Law, § 70.06) and thus the sentence imposed cannot be considered unduly harsh or excessive so as to constitute an abuse of discretion (see, e.g., People v. Dittmar, 41 A D 2d 788). We find no merit in defendant’s contention that section 70.06 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional in that its minimum sentence requirement constitutes a harsh and excessive sentence and thus cruel *256and unusual punishment because it imposes an increased sentence for second and habitual offenders and removes from the court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- John Allen Kendrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. RicciardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. CandelariaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. NavedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.