Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 2006No. A05-2261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Edward Molnar appeals from an order of the Minnesota Racing Commission, upholding Canterbury Park’s decision to exclude him permanently from its card club. Molnar argues that Canterbury Park violated his constitutional and statutory right to due process in its temporary-exclusion decision and that the racing commission abused its discretion on evidentiary issues and by upholding Canterbury Park’s permanent-exclusion decision. Molnar also maintains that the commission exceeded its authority by affirming his permanent exclusion rather than imposing a fine. Because we…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Steel Corporation, Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API