Commonwealth v. Joyce
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 128, Nov. T., 1896, by defendants, from order of Q. S. Schuylkill Co., July T., 1894, No. 27, refusing rule to show cause why the judgment should not be stricken off and the judgment opened and defendants let into a defense. This case was argued below and above with the preceding case, and the facts sufficiently appear by reference to the statement of the facts therein set forth.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reeder, J.,
This case is connected with and was argued, both in the court below and here, at the same time as that of the appeal we have just considered in the foregoing case, and the two cases were disposed of by the learned judge of the court below in a single opinion. A motion was made in the court below to strike off the judgment for matters apparent upon the face of the record, the rule was discharged, and the appeal was taken from the decision of the court below on the discharge of the rule.
*617The bond in this case was a bond given to the commonwealth of Pennsylvania by Peter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Croasdell v. TallantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Rumfelt v. ClemensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- The Kingston Nat. Bk. v. Walters Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. SweigartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899