Legal Opinion

Braden's Estate.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1895No. Appeal, No. 279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 279, Oct. T., 1894, by Isaac K. Wood, from order of C. P. Greene Co., Jan. T., 1890, No. 1, overruling exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Sterrett, C. J., Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Mestrezat, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 279, Oct. T., 1894, by Isaac K. Wood, from order of C. P. Greene Co., Jan. T., 1890, No. 1, overruling exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Sterrett, C. J., Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Mestrezat, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The exceptions to the report of the auditor, J. P. Teagarden, Esq., were as follows: “ 1. The auditor erred in awarding the proceeds of the bank stock and other stocks to fi. fa., No. 50, January Term 1890, Jane Plowden v. D. W. Braden. “ 2. The auditor erred in not awarding the proceeds of the sale of said stocks to…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

On November 27, 1889, Daniel W. Braden made a general assignment for benefit of creditors of all his estate to Isaac K. Wood. The deed was recorded same day. On the same dajq Jane Howden entered a judgment against Braden for $7,397.61, and immediately issued execution thereon; the writ came into the sheriff’s hands at 11.30 A. M., as shown by the indorsement; the deed of assignment was delivered to the assignee at I. 50 P. M. When the execution came into the sheriff’s hands, Braden was the owner of three shares Masonic Building Association stock, of the par value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M'Clelland v. SlingluffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  2. Henderson v. Henderson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re MessengerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. State ex rel. Whitmore v. BarboglioUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Williams Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co. v. ReilySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Hobbs v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Spicks v. Prospect Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API