Legal Opinion

Horine v. C P 68 Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1970Published

1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.

This is a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) for failure to state a cause of action, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.

Plaintiffs, who were tenants of a building owned by defendant C P 68 Corp., allege in their first cause of action for treble damages against C P 68 Corp., only, that they were unlawfully evicted from the premises. Eviction was based on certificates of eviction issued by the Local Rent Administrator of the Temporary State Housing Rent Commission, on landlord’s representation that it desired in good faith to obtain possession of the premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David v. FaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Rosner v. Textile Binding & Trimming Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Rosenbluth v. SackadorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Schussel v. Jamaica Investors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API