Legal Opinion

D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Rich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Suit on replevin bond. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Union County; the Hon. Joseph P. RObarts, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1894, and reversed.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice

Sample delivered the opinion of the Court.

This suit was brought by appellee, as sheriff, for the use of the assignees of T. B. Williams, on a replevin bond alleged to have been executed by appellants on the 15th day of September, 1888, in the penal sum of $600.

The facts out of which the replevin suit arose, briefly stated, are that on the 23d day of December, 1887, D. M. Osborne & Co. entered into a written contract with T. B. Williams, whereby the latter was to sell certain farm machinery for them at a certain commission during the year 1888, which was to be shipped to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dixon v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Corbett v. UnderwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Rankin v. CrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Bennett v. WallerIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Herbert S. Gilbert & Co. v. McGinnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heath & Milligan Mfg. Co. v. National Linseed Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Landt v. McCulloughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API