Legal Opinion
Kingan & Co. v. Silver
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1899No. 2,727PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Erom the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— On the former appeal of this case the complaint was held good, and the judgment was reversed with instructions to overrule the demurrer. Kingan & Company v. Silvers, 13 Ind. App. 80. Each appellee then filed an answer to which appellant replied. The case was tried by the court.
The complaint is set out in the former opinion. Appellees’ answers were alike, except one setting up suretyship, which is not questioned on this appeal.
The answers allege that Mchols was appellant’s traveling salesman; that he secured the execution of the note in suit, and while conveying it to appellant altered it,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lillie v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Kingan & Co. v. SilversIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Nickless v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Logansport v. HumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Dipert v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stickler v. Live Stock InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Coppes v. Union National Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906