Legal Opinion
In re Michael Bahary & Steven Bahary Partnership
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 13, 2015No. 11 B 41826PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order on Motion For Relief From Judgment (Dkt. No. 418)
JACQUELINE P. COX, Bankruptcy Judge.
On December 29, 2014, this Court granted the Motion of the Reorganized Debtor, the Michael Bahary & Steven Bahary Partnership (the “Bahary Partnership” and the “Debtor”), for a Rule to Show Cause requiring Napleton Enterprises, LLC and Rachael A. Gould to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for suing the Bahary Partnership and Ban-co Popular to enforce Napleton’s purported Right of First Refusal in a state court action regarding transactions that ensued in this bankruptcy case in 2012.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- 17 Collier bankr.cas.2d 743, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,955 in the Matter of James P. Wood, M.D. And Carol B. Wood, Debtors. Dr. Arthur E. Wood, III v. Dr. James P. Wood, Carol Wood, Woodrow Barham & Wayne Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- 17 Collier bankr.cas.2d 230, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,695 in the Matter of Xonics, Inc., Debtors. Elscint, Inc., and Elscint Imaging, Inc. v. First Wisconsin Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- In Re Stephen J. McdonaldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re BaharyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015