Legal Opinion

Jaffray v. Nast

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county." Action by Edward S. Jaffray, Howard Jaffray, McVickar, John R. Woodruff, and Charles J. Hatfield against Louis Hast, Samuel M. Hast, and Hathan Hast, doing business as Hast Bros. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorlett, J.

On the 29th day of October, 1889, the county judge of Alleghany county granted an attachment against the defendants’ property in this action. In December, 1889, the defendants made a motion, based upon the original papers, to vacate the attachment. It was -heard before Justice Ma-comber, at the Monroe special term, on the 30th day of December. The application was denied on the ground that the defendants were estopped. The court did not consider or determine the sufficiency of the affidavits upon which the attachment was granted. The defendants appeal from the order .to this court.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Menagh v. . WhitwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Jones v. FowlerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lacker v. DreherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Adams v. HilliardNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Patterson v. DelaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API