Legal Opinion

Branford Manor Associates v. Hargey

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 1, 1976No. File No. 26308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff is about to commence an action against the defendant and seeks a prejudgment remedy by way of garnishing funds of the defendant in the hands of her attorney. The defendant is a welfare recipient and objects to the granting of the prejudgment remedy, alleging that those funds are still welfare funds and are not attachable under the provisions of § 17-82k of the General Statutes.

The issue appears to be one of first impression in Connecticut. Other jurisdictions have previously ruled that funds of a welfare recipient deposited in a bank account were not subject to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacQuarrie v. BalchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Guardian Loan Co. of Plainfield v. BaylisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Northwest Engineering Credit Union v. JahnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API