Legal Opinion

Dorsheimer v. Rorback

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1873Published

On petition. Motion to amend final decree.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill was filed by the complainant (who was an idiot) by guardian, as one of the next of kin of John Rorback, deceased, late of Newton, in the county of Sussex, to recover a distributive share of his estate.

The share was $6701.30, and with interest amounted, at the date of the decree, to $13,335.60. The defence was, that the share had been paid by the administrators of John Rorback, deceased, to John Rorback, who claimed under an assignment from an alleged guardian of 'the complainant. The Chancellor decreed in favor of the complainant, both against John Rorback, who had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sprague v. GrahamNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Whittimore v. WhittimoreNew York Court of Chancery · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API