Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Com.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 2008No. Record 070399PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice S. BERNARD GOODWYN.

In this appeal of a judgment from the Court of Appeals, we consider whether a defendant is "a person" as that term is used in Code § 46.2-817(B), a penal statute.

The statute states in relevant part:

B. Any person who, having received a visible or audible signal from any law-enforcement officer to bring his motor vehicle to a stop, drives such motor vehicle in a willful and wanton disregard of such signal so as to interfere with or endanger the operation of the law-enforcement vehicle or endanger a person is guilty of a Class 6 felony.

Harlan Anthony Phelps…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meeks v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Harward v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Farrakhan v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Melanson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Robinson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Coleman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  2. Johnson, Ronald v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  3. Barson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  4. Smith v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  5. Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API