Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1986No. C2-86-1082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

The- State of Minnesota appeals from a pretrial order dismissing a forgery charge against respondent John Roscoe Williams in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.63, subd. 1(6) (1984). Dismissal of the charge was predicated on State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 209 N.W.2d 678 (1973). The State contends that the trial court’s construction of Kalvig was erroneous as a matter of law and that it had the authority to prosecute the forgery charge. Appeal is taken pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.04, subd. 1(1). We reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

The facts alleged in the complaint are as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. LinderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. KalvigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. DanowitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API