Legal Opinion

Cannady v. Price

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1996No. 95CA0963Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KAPELKE.

In this trust administration proceeding, respondents, Nancy Fay Cannady and Ryita Lynn Price, appeal from the trial court’s order requiring that certain fees and expenses of the trustees and their attorneys be allocated one-half to income and one-half to principal. We affirm.

Petitioner, Marie Cannady, is the life income beneficiary of the trust established by her husband, J.V. Cannady (settlor). Respondents are the settlor’s daughters and also the co-trustees and remaindermen of the trust.

Pursuant to the terms of the trust, respondents provided petitioner with interim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Venables v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API