Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Royal Body Care, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 28, 2007No. 05-06-01557-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG-MIERS.

Appellant Patrick Flanagan appeals the trial court’s order overruling his special appearance. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (Vernon 2005). In four issues, Flanagan contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a finding of general or specific jurisdiction, and the exercise of jurisdiction over him does not comport with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. We conclude Flanagan is subject to specific jurisdiction and affirm the trial court’s order.

Factual BackgROund

Flanagan is the inventor of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Nogle & Black Aviation, Inc. v. Faveretto Ex Rel. Migliori, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. Julie Stull & JMJ Productions v. Greg LaPlant and Chris Kolaskos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  3. Ahrens & DeAngeli, P.L.L.C. v. Flinn, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  4. CRITHFIELD v. Boothe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Alliance Royalties, LLC v. Boothe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API