Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald Finney, Patricia Finney and Richard A. Kelley
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 29, 1983No. 82-2553PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
Donald Finney, Patricia Finney and Richard A. Kelley were indicted for eight counts of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, arising out of their business operation in Houston, Texas, variously known as Consumer Hotline, Promotional Advertising Services, and Responsive Advertising Services. The jury returned verdicts of guilty on all counts against all defendants. The trio timely appealed, each challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Finding the evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdicts, we affirm.
Facts
Consumer Hotline was engaged in soliciting business listings…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. KenofskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- R.A.G.S. Couture, Inc. v. Mary M. Hyatt and Oren M. WelborneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Anthony J. Vesich, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Billy L. Massey and Larry P. WagesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Joseph E. Casperone, Francis A. Clark and Oklahoma Ltd., I v. Landmark Oil & Gas Corp., Larry B. BachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.