Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentOnion, Judge
I respectfully dissent. As I view the record, the search and seizure here involved was unreasonable in violation of the Fourth Amendment, United States Constitution and Article I, Sec. 9, Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St.; See also Article 1.06, V.A.C.C.P. Therefore, the fruits of the warrantless search were inadmissible and their admission, over objection, calls, in my opinion, for reversal.
Officer Cantrell of the Burglary and Theft Detail of the Dallas Police Department testified that after talking to the alleged thief, he went to the Wine Stop Liquor store at 2608 Bexar Street in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.