Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Colon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2004PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Franklin Colon, appellant, has brought this appeal from his judgment of sentence following a jury verdict of guilty on charges of robbery, conspiracy to commit robbery, and second-degree murder. The trial judge summarized the facts of this case as follows:

[Franklin Colon and Joey Gonzales], along with another confederate, Eliut Betancourt, were in search of money on the evening of October 29, 2001, and hatched a plan. Armed with a handgun that had been passed among the three of them, they set out to find an easy victim from whom they could steal. Driving…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. SerranoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Com. v. Benton, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Braswell, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API