Legal Opinion
Altman v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 12, 2012No. Docket 11-2074-cvPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-Appellant Steven Altman, an attorney admitted to practice in New York, appeals from an order of the district court (Holwell, /.) dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Section 25(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides a comprehensive remedial scheme that required Altman to appeal an SEC debarment order to a court of appeals. See Altman v. SEC, 768 F.Supp.2d 554, 558-62 (S.D.N.Y.2011). Altman filed the complaint in the district court against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) seeking…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Altman v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Altman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jarkesy v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Lanier v. Bats Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- In re Barclays Liquidity Cross & High Frequency Trading LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Jarkesy v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Chau v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.