Legal Opinion

Quiktrip Corp. v. Fesenko

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 27, 1997No. A97A1664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

We granted defendant Quiktrip Corporation’s (“Quiktrip”) application for interlocutory appeal in order to review the state court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. Concluding that plaintiffs Tatiana Fesenko and her husband, Yuri Fesenko, have offered no evidence as to Quiktrip’s negligence and that plaintiff Tatiana Fesenko failed to exercise ordinary care for her own safety, we reverse.

Plaintiff Tatiana Fesenko went to buy gas at a Quiktrip store on August 1, 1993. She pulled her car up to a pump, got out of the car, and began to dispense $12 worth of fuel.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Hopkins v. Hudgins & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hindu Temple & Community Center of the High Desert, Inc. v. RaghunathanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Phillips v. South West Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Camden Oil Co., LLC v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Keisha, LLC v. Dundon.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. Tracye Currie v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API