Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Commercial Travelers' Mutual Accident Ass'n of America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1895No. Appeal, No. 220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 220, Oct. T., 1895, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1895, No. 55, making absolute a rule to set aside service of process. Rule to set aside service of process.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 220, Oct. T., 1895, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1895, No. 55, making absolute a rule to set aside service of process. Rule to set aside service of process. Kennedy, P. J., filed the following opinion: The return of service of summons in this case is in the following words, viz: “Served May 20th, 1895, by delivering to Dr. T. J. Patterson, agent for The Commercial Travelers’ Mutual Accident Association of America, a true and attested copy of this writ and by making known to him the contents thereof.” The testimony taken on this rule shows…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

All that need be said in vindication of the correctness of the decree setting aside the service of the writ in this case, will be found in the clear and concise opinion of the learned president of the common pleas; and on it the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Nickerson v. Warren City Tank & Boiler Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Bragdon v. Perkins-Campbell Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Altenberg v. Shreve Chair & Lumber Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API