Legal Opinion

State v. Moroney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1980No. 35883, CA 14755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction, after trial to the court, of menacing, ORS 163.190. He assigns as error: (1) the trial court’s denial of his pretrial motion for dismissal of the indictment based on the delay between the acts of which he was accused and the return of the indictment, in violation of his right to due process; and (2) the denial of his motion for acquittal and the trial court’s ruling that menacing is a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, the crime of which defendant was accused by the indictment. We affirm.

The Due Process Clause of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. TothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MoroneyOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API