Legal Opinion
In re Prudence Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 4, 1936No. Nos. 27496, 27028PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
The Reconstruction Finance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as RFC) moves for an order directing the trustees of the debtor herein to pay over to it the sum of $77,687.35 representing the whole of the amortizations which matured, respectively, on January 1, 1933, and July 1, 1933, and part of the amortization which matured on January 1, 1934, upon a certain bond and mortgage.
Substantially all of the facts involved herein have been agreed upon in a stipulation of facts which discloses the following: In April, 1932, the RFC loaned the debtor $1,500,000. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brainard v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Brainard v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lowenfeld v. WimpleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Hopwood Plays, Inc. v. KemperNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In re Prudence Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Prudence Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936