Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 1985No. AT-38PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus1 for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.

Petitioner, in his pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, seeks credit for time served on parole and MCR [mandatory conditional release]. Section 947.21, Florida Statutes, does not mandate that an inmate be given credit for time spent on parole; it merely authorizes the Commission, at its discretion, to grant credit for same. Coleman v. Wainwright, 323 So.2d 581 (Fla.1975). Furthermore, it is clear that a writ cannot be used to compel a public agency…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SolomonSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Kirsch v. GreadingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Graham v. VannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Coleman v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  5. Evans v. St. Regis Paper CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Singletary v. PowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. State v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API