Bronson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus1 for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.
Petitioner, in his pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, seeks credit for time served on parole and MCR [mandatory conditional release]. Section 947.21, Florida Statutes, does not mandate that an inmate be given credit for time spent on parole; it merely authorizes the Commission, at its discretion, to grant credit for same. Coleman v. Wainwright, 323 So.2d 581 (Fla.1975). Furthermore, it is clear that a writ cannot be used to compel a public agency…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunter v. SolomonSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Kirsch v. GreadingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Graham v. VannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Coleman v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Evans v. St. Regis Paper CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Singletary v. PowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988