Legal Opinion
North Carolina Fox & Hound, Inc. v. Saul Subsidiary I Ltd. Partnership
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided March 28, 2005No. 1:02CV00806Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
BEATY, District Judge.
On February 16, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order and Recommendation No. 3 [Document # 61] was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff filed timely Objections. The Court has now reviewed the Objections and the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made, and the Court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Document # 61] is therefore affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gamewell Manufacturing, Inc., a Corporation v. Hvac Supply, Inc., and Aeronca, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Robert C. Hensley v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, and Alan Modliszewski, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Frederick L. Millner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Robert A. PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIMKEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Fairfax Countywide Citizens Ass'n v. County of FairfaxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.