Legal Opinion

J. P. Seeburg Piano Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 24, 1926No. D-866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge

The facts in this case are stipulated. Plaintiff sues to recover an excise tax exacted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under Title IX, section 900, paragraph (11), of the revenue act of 1921 (42 Stat. 291). The pertinent sections of the taxing act read as follows:

“ Sec. 900. That from and after January 1, 1922, there shall be levied, assessed, collected, and paid upon the following articles sold or leased by the manufacturer, producer, or importer a tax equivalent to the following percentages of the price for which so sold or leased—

Hi ‡ ^ <i Hi Hi

“(11) Automatic slot-device vending…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thermo King Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. U. S. Thermo Control Co. v. The United States. Thermo King Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Motor Coach Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Thermo King Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Thermo King Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API