Legal Opinion

Golia v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeter M. Daly, J.

Motion by the defendants other than the defendant Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that the causes of action therein alleged are barred by the Statute of Limitations.

The complaint contains five causes of action, the first three on behalf of the plaintiff Andrew Golia (hereinafter called the plaintiff), the fourth on behalf of plaintiff’s infant son, and the fifth by the infant’s mother for loss of the infant’s services.

The first cause of action is brought to recover for the malpractice of the individual defendants and the negligence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Robins v. FinestoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Calabrese v. BickleyNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ranalli v. BreedNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baatz v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Golia v. Health Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Rokita v. GermaineNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Baatz v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API