Legal Opinion

Holman v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1925No. 3135. [fn*]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). In support of the contention that the court below did not have jurisdiction of the suit, appellants insist it appeared that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest claimed, was less than $500. Looking alone to the amended petition on which the trial was had, it did so appear, but the sum sued for according to the original petition was $817.27, exclusive of interest. In such a ease it seems to be settled that, when a question as to the jurisdiction of a court, dependent upon the amount in controversy, arises, and there is no plea that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Grayson County National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cattlemen'S Trust Co. v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Mecca Fire Ins. Co. (Mut.) of Waco v. First State Bank of HamlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Gulf Coast Transp. Co. v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williamson v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API