Harding v. Ed Taussig Edsel Motors, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRUGÉ, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit to avoid the sale of a 1958 Edsel convertible automobile and for the return of the purchase price paid therefor, alleging certain redhibitory vices as a cause of action. After trial on the merits the lower court rendered judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands and dismissing his suit at his cost.
Article 2520 of LSA-C.C. defines redhibition to be the avoidance of a sale “on account of some vice or defect in the thing sold, which renders it either absolutely useless, or its use so inconvenient and imperfect, that it must be supposed that the buyer would…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fisher v. City Sales and ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Ehrlich v. Roby Motors Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Coco v. MacK Motor Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Galt v. HerndonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dickerson v. Begnaud Motors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ingersoll v. Star Chrysler, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Stack v. IrwinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Abraham v. Dalworth Machinery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- RO Roy & Company, Inc. v. a & W TRAILER SALESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.