McVicker v. Beedy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Debt, on a judgment recovered before an Associate Justice •of the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, presiding and Folding courts in the second judicial district for the county of Fayette.
Read the full summary
Debt, on a judgment recovered before an Associate Justice •of the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, presiding and Folding courts in the second judicial district for the county of Fayette. By the record of that judgment, it appeared that the claim sued was for labor done in Illinois ; that one William H. Lee was summoned as garnishee of said Beedy: that notices of said suit were published in the public newspapers, according to the requirements of the laws of Illinois; that bond was duly given for the payment of such costs as Beedy might recover ; that the said Beedy did not appear, but…
1Opinion of the CourtWells, J.
The question arising upon the pleadings in .this case is, whether an action upon a judgment rendered in the State of Illinois, in which it-appears that a garnishee was summoned in the suit, and paid into court the sum by him disclosed, can be maintained in this State against the defendant, who was not an inhabitant of that State, and did not reside there when it was rendered, nor when the original process was commenced upon which it was founded, but resided then in this State, and had no notice of the suit, and did not appear and answer to it.
In the case of the Middlesex Bank v. Butman, 29…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Webb Fur. Co. Inc. v. EverettSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Howard v. McNaughtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Rockwood v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Keenan v. KeenanNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- John Veneziano v. Bernard J. SaulnierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.