Legal Opinion

Scott v. Thrall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1908No. 15,478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Greenwood district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This was a suit by Harry T. Scott to contest a will upon the ground that the testator was not of sound mind, and because of alleged alterations therein after it was signed and attested. The trial court found against the plaintiff and sustained the probate of the will. The plaintiff does not rely upon the first ground, but urges that the evidence proved the alterations as alleged, and that the court erred in refusing to set aside the probate.

The will was drawn by the testator, who was advanced in years and infirm, but had been a man of large…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crossman v. . CrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GeiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Rich v. BowkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Neil v. J. I. Case & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. GoertnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Rice v. MonroeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Kerr v. KerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Colman v. LindleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Henley v. CarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API