Legal Opinion

Foote v. Kearney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1930No. 22496. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In this action of ejectment, brought by other parties as plaintiffs, in which appellants were substituted, it is sought to quiet title to an eight-foot strip of a certain lot claimed by respondents by adverse possession for over ten years. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and findings, conclusions and judgment awarded respondents, from which this appeal is taken.

The property involved is an eight-foot strip of a platted lot in block 44, supplemental plat of A. Pontius addition to Seattle, designated as 315 Boylston avenue north. Appellants and their predecessors in interest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowers v. LedgerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Yesler Estate, Inc. v. HolmesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Schmitz v. KleeWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McNaught-Collins Improvement Co. v. MayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. McCormick v. SorensonWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hammond v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Frolund v. FranklandWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API