Legal Opinion

People v. Brooks

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1979No. Docket 78-2865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to a prison term of from two to five years.

Defendant argues that reversal is required because he was not advised of his due process right to a contested hearing before he pled guilty. While the rights of a defendant at a revocation hearing are limited, they do include the right to a contested hearing. Gagnon v Scarpelli, 411 US 778; 93 S Ct 1756; 36 L Ed 2d 656 (1973). This Court has held that before a defendant may knowingly and voluntarily waive this right by pleading guilty, he must be informed of the right.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. RialMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. HardinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. Michael BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. DarrellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KnoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. EdwardsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. PrattoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. StallworthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API