Conway v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of capital murder, and punishment was assessed at life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections by virtue of the jury’s answers to the special issues. Appellant urges three points of error.
The first point of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on both the issue of murder and whether the murder was committed while in the course of committing robbery. We approach both under the appropriate standard; i.e., after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Pry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Duhamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- United States v. Auviene D'antignac, A/K/A Jack D'antignac, Patrick Glen Knight, Thomas Olden Thornton, Timothy David Cahill and Robert Wheeler WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Cruz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fernandez v. City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Robert King Conway, Jr. v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Risse Owens, Charles Aycock, Juanita Gonzalez, Jose Aliseda, Jr. Linda Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Robert King Conway, Jr. v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Risse Owens, Charles Aycock, Juanita Gonzalez, Jose Aliseda, Jr. Linda Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006