Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Ramos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 2007Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. A preliminary hearing should be held within ten days of the arraignment under Pa. R.Crim.P. 540(F)(1). After the first listing on May 22, 2003, the preliminary hearing in this case was repeatedly continued until March 24, 2004, a period not of ten days, but of 329 days. The Commonwealth claims there was nothing it could do about this, blaming the delay on the trial court calendar. Yet, this scheduling problem would not have exceeded the run date had *1105the Commonwealth not already continued the case twice before. The Commonwealth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. KearseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. LaftySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. WentzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API