State v. Maricopa Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist. Bd.
Arizona Supreme Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES authored the opinion of the Court, in which VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL and JUSTICES PELANDER, TIMMER, BOLICK, and GOULD and JUDGE ESPINOSA joined. *
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 We here consider whether Arizona students granted deferred removal action by the United States Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") under its Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") policy are eligible for in-state college tuition. "The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens." Arizona v. United States , 567 U.S. 387 , 394, 132 S.Ct. 2492 , 183 L.Ed.2d 351 (2012). Because Congress has not identified DACA recipients as "lawfully present" for purposes of public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Martinez v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans v. Kristin K. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- E.M. v. Nebraska Dept. of Health & Human Servs.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Young Conservatives of Texas Foundation v. The University of North TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2022