Legal Opinion

Orimex Trading, Inc. v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pecora, J.), entered on August 21, 1989, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default and to vacate and set aside the default judgment on the ground of newly discovered evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

It is within the IAS court’s discretion to determine whether or not a party has shown a reasonable excuse for a default (Sanders & Assocs. v Hague Dev. Corp., 100 AD2d 964, 965). Here, defendant’s excuse for his default was that he was not properly served. The record supports the IAS court’s conclusion to the contrary,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thelma Sanders & Associates, Inc. v. Hague Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manhattan Vermeer Co. v. GutermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API