Legal Opinion
Baker v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
This controversy arises out of three contracts, which the plaintiffs’ assignor (hereinafter referred to as the *331plaintiff) entered into with the defendant, Peerless Advertising, Inc. The contracts were concerned with the preparation of an advertising campaign to promote three products of the defendant, Chock Full O’Nuts Corporation. The first two contracts were in writing and were with respect to doughnuts and nuts, respectively. The third was oral and looked to the promotion of coffee.
The contracts, similar in terms, provided for the work to be done by the plaintiff in three stages. The first…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Doubleday & Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Tony Curtis, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- In re KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Reprosystem, BV v. SCM Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Jerry M. Arledge v. Stratmar Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Elvalsons v. Industrial Covers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.