Legal Opinion

In re Bancroft

New York County Courts

Decided May 19, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.

Respondent, the alleged father of an illegitimate child born ¡November 1,1948, challenges the validity of an application on behalf of the child through its guardian ad litem, to set aside and declare null and void, so far as the rights of the child are concerned, an order of this court confirming, pursuant to section 121 of the Domestic Relations Law, a compromise *209agreement between respondent and Dorris Furst, the child’s mother, whereby for an allegedly inadequate consideration she released respondent of any and all claims “ by reason of the birth of said child and the support, education and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Matter of Lyons v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. People Ex Rel. Lawton v. . SnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Manahan v. Petroleum Producing & Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Schneider v. KennatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halloran v. HalloranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Palmer v. BrownNew York Family Court · 1961
  4. Jayson v. JaysonNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API