Legal Opinion

Du Mez v. Dykstra

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 36,189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In 1901 the two owners in common of a government lot of 57 acres divided it. In 1907 plaintiffs purchased the north half. In 1913 defendant bought a small parcel in the south half and in 1914 erected a summer cottage and barn on it.

The north half of the lot is mid land, uninclosed, covered with second growth timber, and has old logging roads on it, one of which, called the “hogback” road, winds over both parts of the original lot. When defendant purchased, his grantor, although he had no interest in the north half, told him the “hog-back” road was the means of access to the premises. The road…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. England v. Ally Ong HingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Burnett v. SladekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Walthers v. TannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Bernard C Swartz Declaration of Trust v. Kathleen L Morrison TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Bernard C Swartz Declaration of Trust v. Kathleen L Morrison TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API