Legal Opinion

Heerdink v. Kohmescher

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1932No. 14,369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlME, J.

This was an action for damages for the death of appellee’s minor son, who was killed in a road intersection collision of the appellant’s car with one in which appellee’s son was riding as a guest.

The complaint was in one paragraph, which was answered by a general denial. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee. A motion for a new trial being overruled, judgment was rendered on'the verdict. The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The specifications of the motion which are properly presented are: (1) The verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Town of Fort BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hoy v. State, ex rel. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Davis v. BabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Vivian Collieries Co. v. CahallIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Elliott v. KrausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kraning v. TaggartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Smith v. CITY OF INDPLS., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Lankford v. LucasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API