Heerdink v. Kohmescher
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKlME, J.
This was an action for damages for the death of appellee’s minor son, who was killed in a road intersection collision of the appellant’s car with one in which appellee’s son was riding as a guest.
The complaint was in one paragraph, which was answered by a general denial. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee. A motion for a new trial being overruled, judgment was rendered on'the verdict. The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The specifications of the motion which are properly presented are: (1) The verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. Town of Fort BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Hoy v. State, ex rel. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Davis v. BabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Vivian Collieries Co. v. CahallIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Elliott v. KrausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kraning v. TaggartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
- Smith v. CITY OF INDPLS., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- Lankford v. LucasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977