Legal Opinion
Noonan v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 9, 1989No. 8543-1-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
—Richard and Erica Noonan, their daughter Linda, Thea Hollingsworth and Jacqueline Shanks, the plaintiffs, brought this action for damages against the State of Washington, members of the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, certain parole officers and other employees, and the Spokane Alcohol Rehabilitation Center, Inc. (SPARC), for injuries inflicted by Michael Jones, while on parole. The State and SPARC moved for summary judgment. Both motions were granted and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
The principal issues presented are whether: (1) the State and its parole officers are shielded from tort…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Joyce v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Savage v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Adela T. Bailor and Darryl Bailor v. Salvation Army and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.