Matter of Sacharoff v. Corsi
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The process of administering the Workmen’s Compensation Law developed the fact that, if the statute was to serve the purpose for which it was designed, there must be available to injured employee-claimants medical care of first quality which is carefully regulated. (See Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co., 274 N. Y. 271 [opinion by Loughran, J.] at pp. 276-277.) To that end the Legislature made statutory provision for the creation of a list of licensed physicians authorized to render such medical care. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 13-b.) The problem common to the two proceedings now…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Allen v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Palmer v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People v. DethloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wignall v. FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- People v. Reilly, New York County Courts1976
- Faingnaert v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Lief v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- In re GinnanNew York Family Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.