Legal Opinion
Holowecki v. Federal Express Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 24, 2010No. 09-3477-cvPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs are twelve current and former couriers who claim that defendant has discriminated against them based on age. This case is now before us for the second time. The district judge to whom this case *45was first assigned dismissed the complaint on the pleadings. See Holowecki v. Fed. Express Corp., 02 Civ. 3355, 2002 WL 31260266 (S.D.N.Y.2002). We reversed, 440 F.3d 558 (2d Cir.2006), and the Supreme Court affirmed our reversal, 552 U.S. 389, 128 S.Ct. 1147, 170 L.Ed.2d 10 (2008). On remand, this case was reassigned to Judge Rakoff, who granted summary judgment to defendant.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mattera v. JPMorgan Chase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Rozenfeld v. Department of Design & ConstructionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Smith v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Delaney v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Waters v. General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.